a flurry of recent articles complained about decline of Google search quality. Is Google a monoculture or a Sex-starved Gorilla?
There was a flurry of recent articles pointing to increasing prevalence of spam on Google.
Google Is a Jungle,
states
Vivek Wadhwa at TechCrunch. Google, Wadhwa contends, has become "a
tropical paradise for spammers and marketers. Almost every search takes
you to websites that want you to click on links that make them money,
or to
sponsored sites that make Google money."
Google's 'House' Has Cracks In Its 'Algorithmic Search Foundations,'
offers Jeff Atwood at Coding Horror. After noticing that websites scraping content from his
Stack Overflow forum
outranked Stack Overflow in Google search results, and giving up on his
Google search for an iPhone 4 case for his wife, Atwood concludes,
"This is the first time since 2000 that I can recall Google search quality ever declining"
Google Is Like Bananas,
says Felix Salmon at Reuters, expanding on the monoculture idea. He cites a recent New Yorker
article
explaining how the banana industry is at risk because the same species
of banana (the Cavendish) is grown and eaten across the world.
Google Needs Sex,
declares Paul Krugman at The
New York Times. Krugman takes stock of the Google search debate,
only to respond, "This makes me think of sex." Why? Evolutionary theory, he explains, suggests that sexual reproduction is in part a defense against parasites.
Read more:
Google and Spam: Imagine a Sex-Starved, Ticklish Gorilla
Comments:
Gregory Piatetsky
I have not noticed declined in Google result quality for more technical searches, related to analytics and data mining, but perhaps those are less useful for spammers.
|