|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Is Rapid-I/YALE equivalent to WEKA with a fancy user interface? |
| Yes |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| No |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Don't know |
|
100% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
alexsee
Joined: 06 Dec 2007 Posts: 3 Location: Vienna, Austria
|
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 1:57 pm Post subject: Rapid-I = WEKA + UI? |
|
|
Hi all,
I think it problematic when Open Source projects include other OS projects entirely. A current example is Rapid-I (earlier YALE), which includes WEKA completely. Now I have contributed lots of code to WEKA, but cannot see that Rapid-I/YALE has ever contributed code in return for their "ursurpation" of WEKA code. Basically, most people "forget" that WEKA has made Rapid-I possible, and so WEKA and YALE can be different options for a DM poll - IMHO a bit problematic.
I have not worked with Rapid-I, and do not intend to. From the feature list, I would classify it as WEKA plus a fancy user-interface - all the stuff about XML format to store settings, combining classifiers, filters, etc.. has been in WEKA almost from the start (I was there - the Experimenter goes back a long way...). If you strike out the features that come from WEKA, almost nothing is left except information visualization, and that is almost by definition "fancy interface" ;-)
I'd like the opinion of independent people who have worked with Rapid-I _and_ WEKA on this. I'll discount all replies by Rapid-I/YALE or WEKA/Pentaho directly related people and would ask you to reveal your affiliation in the reply.
I am loosely affiliated with WEKA, and know most people from the team personally. I was shocked when I found out how Rapid-I makes a lot of money out of what is essentially WEKA's achievement.
Let's discuss. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
|