Big Data and Deep Learning

Spark / Hadoop tools were used by 33% of respondents in KDnuggets 2017 Software Poll, and Deep Learning tools were used by 32%. See the full list of tools in that post.

For each tool X, we compute how frequently it is used with Spark/Hadoop tools (vertical axis), and how frequently it is used with Deep Learning tools (horizontal axis).


Fig. 3: Deep Learning vs Spark/Hadoop affinity for top Data Science, Machine Learning Tools, 2017
Circle size corresponds to tool share of use, and color to Python (blue) vs R (Orange) bias.

We note a cluster of Python-related blue-colored circles in the upper-right part of the chart, including scikit-learn, PyCharm, Anaconda, Java, and Unix tools, which are more frequently used both with Spark/Hadoop and with Deep Learning tools.

This suggests an emergence of Python-friendly Big Data / Deep Learning ecosystem.

We note that Scala is the most "Big Data" associated tool.

To make Fig. 3 more legible, it only includes tools with at least 200 votes and excludes Deep Learning and Spark/Hadoop tools. See more detailed information in the table 1 below for tools with at least 100 votes.

Table 1: Deep Learning vs Spark/Hadoop affinity for top Data Science, Machine Learning Tools, 2017

Tool	Votes	% with Spark/Hadoop	% with Deep Learning
ALL	2881	33.4%	31.9%
Python	1516	45.1%	47.8%
R language	1502	40.3%	36.6%
SQL Language	1006	44.5%	34.5%
RapidMiner	946	28.2%	26.0%
Excel	810	28.6%	26.8%
Spark	654	100.0%	61.8%
Anaconda	629	43.7%	55.3%
Tensorflow	581	57.0%	100.0%
scikit-learn	561	49.6%	64.3%
Tableau	560	36.8%	29.5%
KNIME	551	29.6%	31.8%
Open Source Hadoop Tools	431	100.0%	59.2%
Java	399	50.4%	47.1%
Microsoft SQL Server	334	39.5%	32.9%
SQL on Hadoop tools	298	100.0%	56.0%
Microsoft Power BI	295	37.6%	35.9%
Weka	281	37.4%	43.1%
Unix tools	278	55.0%	48.2%
Keras	274	54.0%	100.0%
PyCharm	260	45.8%	58.1%
Dataiku	235	53.6%	43.4%
Commercial Hadoop Tools	218	100.0%	53.7%
MATLAB	214	34.6%	48.1%
Scala	214	89.3%	62.6%
SAS Base	204	27.0%	19.6%
IBM SPSS Statistics	196	32.1%	21.9%
Other programming and data languages	196	41.3%	38.3%
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning	184	57.1%	54.9%
IBM SPSS Modeler	182	44.5%	24.2%
Languages: C/C++	181	45.9%	53.0%
H2O.ai	179	58.7%	63.1%
Theano	167	54.5%	100.0%
SAS Enterprise Miner	162	29.0%	25.9%
Alteryx	152	35.5%	23.7%
Other free analytics/data mining tools	139	38.8%	51.1%
Other Deep Learning Tools	138	68.1%	100.0%
MLlib	130	90.8%	66.2%
IBM Watson / Watson Analytics	125	52.8%	40.0%
Microsoft R Server (former Revolution Analytics)	125	63.2%	55.2%
QlikView	121	34.7%	28.1%
Orange	115	24.3%	39.1%

Here is the link to anonymized poll data in CSV format, with columns

• N: record number (randomized, records not in order of voting)
• region: usca: US/Canada, euro: Europe, asia, ltam: Latin America, afme: Africa/Middle East, aunz: Australia/New Zealand
• Python: 1 if Votes (last column) includes Python, 0 otherwise
• R language : 1 if Votes includes "R Language", 0 otherwise. We used "R Language" instead of R for ease of regex matching
• SQL Language: 1 if Votes includes "SQL Language", 0 otherwise.
• RapidMiner: 1 if Votes includes RapidMiner, 0 otherwise.
• Excel: 1 if Votes includes Excel, 0 otherwise.
• Spark: 1 if Votes includes Spark, 0 otherwise.
• Anaconda: 1 if Votes includes Anaconda, 0 otherwise.
• Tensorflow: 1 if Votes includes Tensorflow, 0 otherwise.
• scikit-learn: 1 if Votes includes scikit-learn, 0 otherwise.
• Tableau: 1 if Votes includes Tableau, 0 otherwise.
• KNIME: 1 if Votes includes KNIME, 0 otherwise.
• Deep: 1 if Votes includes Deep, 0 otherwise.
• Spark/Hadoop: 1 if Votes includes Spark/Hadoop, 0 otherwise.
• ntools: number of tools
• Votes: list of votes, separated by a semicolon ";"

Let me know what you think!