KDnuggets Home » News » 2012 » Dec » Publications » Pearl Graph, the Incredible Set: New Names for Statistical Methods

Pearl Graph, the Incredible Set: New Names for Statistical Methods


 
  
< Previous post Next post >
Statisticians and Computer Scientists have done a poor job of choosing names. Who wants to use a method called "the Stalin-Mussolini Matrix Completion Algorithm"? And who would pass up the opportunity to use the "Schwarzenegger-Shatner Statistic" ? Here are some suggestions for renaming.


Prof. Larry Wasserman in his Normal Deviate Blog, Dec 16, 2012 suggests New Names For Statistical Methods:

Bayesian Inference.
Bayes did use his famous theorem to do a calculation. But it was really Laplace who systematically used Bayes' theorem for inference.
New Name: Laplacian Inference.

Judea Pearl Bayesian Nets. A Bayes nets is just a directed acyclic graph endowed with probability distribution. This has nothing to do with Bayesian - oops, I mean Laplacian - inference. According to Wikipedia, it was Judea Pearl who came up with the name. New Name: Pearl Graph.

Unbiased Estimator.
Talk about a name that promises more than it delivers.
New Name: Mean Centered Estimator.


Credible Set. This is a set with a specified posterior probability content such as: here is a 95 percent credible set. Might as well make it sound more exciting.
New Name: Incredible Set.

...
No constant is used more than 0. Since no one else has ever names it, this is my chance for a place in history.
New Name: Wasserman's Constant.

Read more.



< Previous post Next post >

KDnuggets Home » News » 2012 » Dec » Publications » Pearl Graph, the Incredible Set: New Names for Statistical Methods